Untitled Document



Dear Christian,

This is likely to be the largest and most studied annual survey of American Christian opinion. We will share the results of this enormous landmark survey with...

  • 2016 Candidates for President and Congress;
  • Members of Congress and their key staff;
  • Governors and state lawmakers;
  • America’s Christian clergy; and
  • The media (including reporters, news producers, news editors, commentators, radio talk show hosts, influential bloggers, and news websites).

We expect this survey of 10,000,000 Christians to receive wide media coverage and the results to be studied carefully by every politician. Especially in election years, America’s politicians pay close attention to public opinion. Please be sure to complete the important DONATION REPLY section at the bottom of this page.

Sincerely,

Brian Burch,

President, CatholicVote.org

INSTRUCTIONS: Please select the answers that come closest to your view. Leave blank any questions you would rather not answer.

ISSUE SUMMARY: When Pope Francis visited with President Obama at the White House in 2015, President Obama’s most prominent guests included a pro-abortion nun, a male transvestite, a gay Episcopal bishop, and a transgendered woman (a man who had surgery to become a woman).

1. Do you think President Obama’s guest list was deliberately calculated to insult Pope Francis and faithful Catholics worldwide — as a way to demonstrate Obama’s disagreement with Catholic moral teachings on life, sex, and marriage? Or do you think the Obama White House just wasn’t paying much attention to the guest list?

ISSUE SUMMARY: The Obama Justice Department forced the Little Sisters of the Poor to pursue legal action when the Justice Department refused to let the Little Sisters follow their consciences. The Justice Department tried to force the nuns to comply with the Abortifacient and Contraception Mandate in ObamaCare that requires all Americans (including Catholic and other pro-life Americans) to purchase health insurance that includes coverage for contraception and drugs that cause abortion.

3. Do you agree or disagree with CatholicVote that this Abortifacient and Contraception Mandate in ObamaCare is an unconstitutional violation of the FIRST AMENDMENT’s protections for religious freedom and freedom of conscience?

4. Do you believe ObamaCare is more about making sure the poor have health insurance coverage and keeping health care costs down? Or is ObamaCare more about advancing the pro-abortion radical social and moral agenda?

ISSUE SUMMARY: A judge fined Christian bakers in Portland, Oregon, $135,000 for refusing to participate in a same-sex wedding ceremony. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a $7,000 fine imposed on Jonathan and Elaine Huguenin for declining to provide photography services for a same-sex “marriage” ceremony.
ISSUE SUMMARY: The Inspector General of the IRS has concluded that the IRS has purposely targeted more than 500 Catholic, other Christian, and organizations that disagree with President Obama with punishing audits. By contrast, very few (if any) liberal organizations were audited by the IRS. As part of its audits of churches, the IRS demanded copies of sermons, prayers, and church membership lists.
ISSUE SUMMARY: Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is telling Christians that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” In other words, she is saying Christians need to change their beliefs to agree with same-sex “marriage” and abortion-on-demand (including partial-birth abortion) and even threatens saying “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will” [against those who subscribe to Christian moral beliefs.]
ISSUE SUMMARY: The U.S. Supreme Court has become the most powerful arm of government, especially with the four radical Justices on the court who make up their own laws out of thin air instead of following the Constitution and laws Congress passes. For example, the court in 2016 declared same-sex “marriage” to be a fundamental Constitutional right and overturned the laws of the states, when no such right exists in the Constitution. Whoever is elected President in 2016 is likely to have three new Supreme Court appointments and will set the direction of the court for generations.